Quoting%20commentary for Bava Kamma 38:9
אלא חייב בעל תרנגול מאי שנא כוליה נזק דלא דכתיב (שמות כא, לג) כי יפתח איש בור ולא שור בור חצי נזק נמי איש בור ולא שור בור
For in the case of Horn do not its passions get the better of it, as may be said here also? Or shall we perhaps say that in the case of Horn, the animal is prompted by a malicious desire to do damage, whereas, in the case before us, there is no malicious desire to do damage?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' It should therefore come under the category of Tooth and Foot, for which there is no liability on public ground. ');"><sup>8</sup></span>
Explore quoting%20commentary for Bava Kamma 38:9. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.